Wole Soyinka tackles Buhari in 7 ways over Fulani herdsmen
Nobel Laureate Prof Wole Soyinka, has weighed in on the herdsmen/farmers crisis that has led to the deaths of more than 80 persons in the last couple of days.
In an essay titled: ‘impunity rides again through killer herdsmen’, Soyinka called out the Muhammadu Buhari administration for not doing enough to tackle the killer pastoralists.
Here are 7 take-aways from Soyinka’s piece:
1. Nigeria is repeating the Boko Haram mistake with herdsmen
According to Soyinka, the Boko Haram insurgents were first seen as a harmless bunch of rag-tag persons fed up with the system.
"Boko
Haram was a product of social inequities, they preached – one even
chortled: We stand for justice, so we are all Boko Haram! We warned
that – yes indeed – the inequities of society were indeed part of the
story, but why do you close your eyes against other, and more critical
malfunctions of the human mind, such as theocratic lunacy? Now it is
happening again. The nation is being smothered in Vaseline when the
diagnosis is so clearly – cancer!” Soyinka wrote.
The Nobel Laureate called on the government to go hard on the killer herdsmen.
2. Like Buhari, like Jonathan
Here is how Soyinka puts it:
“We
have been here before – now, ‘before’ is back with a vengeance.
President Goodluck Jonathan refused to accept that marauders had carried
off the nation’s daughters; President Muhammed Buhari and his
government – including his Inspector-General of Police - in near
identical denial, appear to believe those killer herdsmen who strike
again and again at will from one corner of the nation to the other, are
merely hot-tempered citizens whose scraps occasionally degenerate into
“communal clashes” – I believe I have summarized him accurately.
“The
marauders are naughty children who can be admonished,
paternalistically, into good neighbourly conduct. Sometimes of course,
the killers were also said to be non-Nigerians after all. The
contradictions are mind-boggling”.
3. Soyinka tackles El-Rufai
There were stern words in his piece for Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai.
Soyinka
thinks that like Buhari, El-Rufai has been making excuses for the
herdsmen; most of whom have been identified as kinsmen of both leaders.
Read below and see for yourself:
"First
the active policy of appeasement, then the language of endorsement. El
Rufai, governor of Kaduna state, proudly announced that, on assuming
office, he had raised a peace committee and successfully traced the
herdsmen to locations outside Nigerian borders.
"He
then made payments to them from state coffers to cure them of their
homicidal urge which, according to these herdsmen, were reprisals for
some ancient history and the loss of cattle through rustling. The public
was up in arms against this astonishing revelation.
“El
Rufai’s comment then was: No life is more important than another.
Today, that statement needs to be adjusted, to read perhaps – apologies
to George Orwell: “All lives are equal, but a cow’s is more equal than
others.”
4. Soyinka wonders why IPOB has been branded a terrorist outfit and the Miyetti Allah hasn’t
Miyetti Allah is the umbrella organization to which all cattle herders belong.
Soyinka thinks the group should be proscribed like the Indigenous People Of Biafra (IPOB).
“This
question is now current, and justified: just when is terror? I am not
aware that IPOB came anywhere close to this homicidal propensity and
will to dominance before it was declared a terrorist organization. The
international community rightly refused to go along with such an
absurdity.
“For
the avoidance of doubt, let me state right here, and yet again, that
IPOB leadership is its own worst enemy. It repels public empathy,
indeed, I suspect that it deliberately cultivates an obnoxious image,
especially among its internet mouthers who make rational discourse
impossible.
“However, as we
pointed out at the time, the conduct of that movement, even at its most
extreme, could by no means be reckoned as terrorism. By contrast, how do
we categorize Miyetti? How do we assess a mental state that cannot
distinguish between a stolen cow – which is always recoverable – and
human life, which is not.”
5 Soyinka rips into Agriculture minister Audu Ogbeh
Ogbeh came in for criticism for saying that the herdsmen crisis boils down to Nigeria’s inability to develop livestock farming.
After calling Ogbeh his “good friend”, Soyinka writes:
“No,
no, not so, Audu! It is true that I called upon the government a week
ago to stop passing the buck over the petroleum situation. I assure you
however that I never intended that a reverse policy should lead to
exonerating – or appearing to exonerate – mass killers, rapists and
economic saboteurs – saboteurs, since their conduct subverts the efforts
of others to economically secure their own existence, drives other
producers off their land in fear and terror”.
6. Soyinka says the herdsmen issue should be dealt with decisively
Here are his words:
“The
warnings pile up, the distress signals have turned into a prolonged
howl of despair and rage. The answer is not to be found in pietistic
appeals to victims to avoid ‘hate language’ and divisive attributions.
The sustained, killing monologue of the herdsmen is what is at issue. It
must be curbed, decisively and without further evasiveness.
"A
peace meeting was called, attended by the state government and security
agencies of the nation, including the Inspector General of Police. This
group attended – according to reports - with AK47s and other weapons of
mass intimidation visible under their garments. They were neither
disarmed nor turned back. They freely admitted the killings but
justified them by claims that they had lost their cattle to the host
community".
7. Buhari is seeing the same ghosts Jonathan saw
According to Soyinka; “Yes,
Jonathan only saw ‘ghosts’ when Boko Haram was already excising swathes
of territory from the nation space and abducting school pupils. The
ghosts of Jonathan seem poised to haunt the tenure of Mohammed Buhari”.
Oh dear!
In December 2017, a section of Nigeria's online community criticized Soyinka for not being as outspoken on Nigeria's challenges as he was during the Jonathan era.
No comments