Goodluck Jonathan almost stopped Buhari via military takeover'
According to a new book, Jonathan and the PDP almost prevented a Buhari presidency through a military takeover.
Former President Goodluck Jonathan conceded victory to Muhammadu Buhari in a phone conversation as the 2015 election results poured in; but behind the scenes, he asked his political party to contest the result in court.
That’s according to a new book titled “On a platter of gold: how Jonathan won and lost Nigeria” by current APC spokesperson Bolaji Abdullahi who served as Sports Minister in the Jonathan cabinet.
An advance copy of the book was made available to TheCable.
The online platform has been serialising excerpts from the book all week.
According to the author; “many
in President Jonathan’s circles were still convinced that he had moved
too quickly to congratulate Buhari. As they saw it, he should have
tarried a while and possibly consulted more.
"In
spite of what had happened however, it was still possible to salvage
something. Jonathan’s call had more or less shut the door on everything.
However, so long as Buhari had not been sworn in, there would still be
cracks that sheer grit and guile could blow wide open”.
The book also states that the idea of a military coup to stop Buhari’s inauguration was mooted.
Military takeover
“Another
meeting was quickly summoned. Again, the idea of military takeover was
mooted. The two most senior military officers at the meeting held to
deliberate on this however advised that it was too late in the day.
“The
ideal moment would have been before the six weeks postponement. If they
had taken over at the time, they would have sacked (INEC chairman Attahiru) Jega as part of the military intervention and announced a new date for the election.
“While
they might not be able to keep Jonathan in power, they would have been
able to guarantee that Buhari would not be president. As things stood,
no one would be able to withstand the bloodletting that could follow a
military takeover after a clear winner had emerged.”
Conceding too cheaply
Top
ranking PDP officials also held a meeting with Jonathan; where the
decision to contest the election results--even after the concession
phone call was made—was reached.
However, the PDP Chairman at the time, Adamu Mu’azu, refused to buy the plan, writes Abdullahi.
“By
6:00pm, all the President’s men and party bigwigs began to gather at
the banquet hall of the Presidential Villa. Many had rushed back to
Abuja for the meeting, anxious to know the next line of action. They had
all heard the audio of the phone call, but opinions were sharply
divided on whether the president had thrown in the towel too soon,” Abdullahi writes.
“One
South-South governor disclosed that this banquet hall meeting was not
the president’s original idea. He said soon after the president made the
telephone call to Buhari, some Governors had gone to him to express
their reservations about it.
"They
felt he had conceded too cheaply. Their argument was that if the
president and the party had rejected the outcome of the election, they
would have gained a stronger platform to negotiate their exit.
“If
the case had gone to court, probably going all the way to the Supreme
Court, the Buhari government would have remained tentative until the
matter was decided and this would have also bought Jonathan more time,
or even more security out of office.
"They
all agreed that all these were now merely academic. It was at this
point that they decided to call a meeting and see if anything could
still be done to salvage something from what at the time had effectively
become a lost cause.
“Present
at the meeting were Vice President, Namadi Sambo; Senate President David
Mark and his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu; as well as Deputy Speaker of the
House of Representatives, Emeka Ihedioha, who had also just contested
and lost the governorship election in Imo State and was challenging the
results. Others included: the People’s Democratic Party Board of
Trustees Chairman, Tony Anenih;
"Secretary
to the Government of the Federation, Anyim Pius Anyim; Governor of
Cross River State, Liyel Imoke; Governor of Akwa Ibom State, Godswill
Akpabio, and former Governor of Anambra State, Peter Obi. All members of
PDP National Working Committee (NWC) were also present, led by the
party chairman, Adamu Mu’azu. The meeting was chaired by President
Goodluck Jonathan.
“The
back-slapping, generous banter and raucous laughter that usually
preceded such meetings were missing on this day. The banquet hall of the
Presidential Villa held several memories of more exciting days for most
dignitaries. But what was about to happen was anything but a banquet.
"There
would be no feasting. In the last four days, a funereal gloom had
descended on the entire Villa, and the few people that could still be
sighted went about with faces turned to the ground. The mood this
Tuesday afternoon was not any different. Some made courageous attempts
at humour, but these fell flat like a joke made at a burial ground.”
'Stolen Presidency'
The author writes that Jonathan was the first to speak at this meeting.
“Gentlemen,
about an hour ago, I called General Buhari to congratulate him,”
President Jonathan began. He explained that he did not make the call
because he believed that the PDP lost the election, but rather,
following advice from many people, he decided to concede in order to
restore calm to the nation and avoid chaos. He added that, based on
information at his disposal, he believed the election had been massively
rigged and INEC was complicit in the fraud.
Jonathan
thereafter urged his political party, PDP, to issue a statement saying
it would contest the results of the vote in a court of competent
jurisdiction.
“While I have done my
bit as a statesman, I believe the party should issue a strong statement
to reject the results and say that PDP will challenge it in court,” Jonathan said.
It was suggested that the National Publicity Secretary, Olisa Metuh, should issue the statement, writes Abdullahi.
Apparently, the lot would fall on party chairman Mu'azu to carry on with the plans reached at the meeting.
“At
first, many did not know what to make of this. How was it possible to
concede defeat and not accept the results? Was the president asking the
party to overrule or disown him? And if they went along with his
suggestion, would the end result not be the same chaos that he said he
was trying to avert by making the phone call?
“Anenih
had the answers. He said the precedent for this had been set a few
months earlier by the opposition party itself. When Ayo Fayose was
declared winner of the governorship election in Ekiti State, the
incumbent, Kayode Fayemi, promptly accepted defeat and congratulated his
opponent.
"Even though Fayemi
believed the election to be flawed, he said he conceded in order to save
the State from chaos. However, this did not stop the APC from
challenging the results in court. Anenih expressed the view that the
National Chairman, Adamu Mu’azu, should issue the statement.”
“Conscious
that some others in the room also had their own battles to fight and
were not primarily interested in Jonathan’s predicament, Anenih further
stated that discussions on other elections and candidates should wait
until the ‘stolen presidency’ was reclaimed.
"Anenih’s
position was adopted and a team was put together, chaired by Metuh, to
draft a statement for the party chairman. Others in the team were the
party’s National Secretary, Adewale Oladipo; the National Legal Adviser,
Victor Kwon; Pius Anyim and Liyel Imoke. They went to work immediately
and by the following morning, the statement was ready. However, the
unexpected was about to happen,” Abdullahi writes.
“When
the draft statement was presented to Adamu Mu’azu, he declared that he
would not release it. He said he had reflected on the idea of issuing a
statement and was convinced it was not the way to go. Words soon got the
Villa that the party chairman had backed out of the plan. Another round
of panic began. The President himself called Mu’azu’s mobile number
several times, but the party chairman did not answer the phone.
Mu'azu a traitor?
“Many
around the president had suspected all along that Mu’azu was not
altogether committed to the Jonathan project. They started grumbling
openly that his appointment, as Chairman, was another mistake by
Jonathan because Mu’azu himself wanted to be president. When the
Chairman failed to show up for some campaign events, the public saw this
as evidence that things had finally fallen apart. The party had to move
quickly to deny that there was any crack in the PDP ranks.
“Therefore,
for those who had questioned Muazu’s loyalty, here finally was the
clear evidence. If he had any objections to the decision taken at the
previous day’s meeting, why didn’t he say so? they wondered. How could
he have turned around to sabotage a plan that he was technically part
and parcel of? But this was not the time for retribution. That could
wait a few more days. The party chairman was still critical to their
plans. An emissary was immediately dispatched to persuade him to have a
rethink".
Mu'azu tells Akpabio he is no bastard
Former
Governor of Akwa Ibom and current Senate minority leader, Akpabio, was
asked to meet Mu'azu and persuade him to head to court with the results
of the election.
But Mu'azu still wouldn't budge, writes the author.
“Godswill
Akpabio marshaled all the arguments he could muster, but Mu’azu would
not budge. It was also an opportunity for the party chairman to vent
some of his grievances. ‘Look, Akpabio,’ he said, ‘I am not a bastard. I
have honour to protect. The man who contested the election had conceded
defeat. I should now be the one to say that the party would not accept
defeat? When the candidate was picking his phone to congratulate the
winner, did he consult with the party?’
“And
in case anyone was thinking of blaming him for the president’s defeat,
such person should think again. After all, didn’t he warn against the
use of religion and ethnicity by the President’s wife and some of his
other supporters like Ayo Fayose and Fani-Kayode? Didn’t he also warn
that the personal attacks on Buhari would backfire, especially in the
North? If no one listened to him then and allowed things to go
pear-shaped, how could they now turn around and ask him to fall on his
sword for sins committed by others?
“He
insisted that asking him to issue a statement that would most likely
throw the country into turmoil was tantamount to asking him to commit
suicide – if not literally, then certainly politically. If Akpabio
liked, he could sign the statement himself. After all, he was the
Chairman of the PDP Governors’ Forum. A few days after this encounter,
Adamu Mu’azu left the country for Singapore. Some said on medical
grounds. Some said for security reasons. Others said both.”
No comments